4.7 Article

Organic matter from biological soil crusts induces the initial formation of sandy temperate soils

期刊

CATENA
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 196-208

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.06.011

关键词

Microphytic crust; Radiocarbon; Biological soil crust development; Cyanobacteria; Soil organic matter; Vegetation succession

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, Bonn)
  2. Brandenburg Ministry of Science, Research, and Culture (MWFK, Potsdam)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different development stages of algae-dominated and moss-dominated biological soil crusts (BSCs) were sampled on a natural sand dune (<17 years old) and on an experimental sand dune (<8 years old) along a catena, including gradients of vegetation cover, location on the slope, as well as composition and thickness of BSC organisms in northeastern Germany. The accumulation of BSC-derived organic carbon (OC) was determined for bulk materials and fractions less than 63 mu m. The OC composition was characterized by solid-state C-13 NMR spectroscopy and the carbohydrate-C signature. C-14 contents were determined to assess the origin and dynamics of OC. From the radiocarbon contents, two oc pools were differentiated: recent BSC-derived and lignite-derived old OC. Downward movement of OC into the underlying substrate was found only under moss-dominated BSCs at the old sand dune. BSC-derived OC was mainly composed of carbohydrate-C and, to a lesser extent, alkyl C and N-alkyl C, with considerably higher contributions of alkyl C in the young dune, indicating differences in the composition of extracellular polymeric substances produced by the BSCs with age. This is consistent with higher proportions of water-soluble OC of moss-dominated BSCs at the old dune, which is leached in the underlying substrate and initiates soil formation. Because of the channeling effect of mosses, OC depth translocation along with suspended colloidal substances may contribute to OC accumulation in substrates. (c) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据