4.7 Article

The effect of ZnO addition on Co/C catalyst for vapor and aqueous phase reforming of ethanol

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 233, 期 -, 页码 38-45

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.12.044

关键词

Ethanol reforming; Cobalt; Oxidation state; ZnO; Water activation

资金

  1. US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  3. Synchrotron Catalysis Consortium [DE-FG02-05ER15688]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of ZnO addition on the oxidation behavior of Co along with catalytic performance in vapor and aqueous phase reforming of ethanol were investigated on Co supported on carbon black (XC-72R). Carbon was selected to minimize the support interactions. Effect of ZnO addition during both vapor and aqueous phase reforming were compared at 250 degrees C. ZnO addition inhibited the reduction of cobalt oxides by H-2 and created surface sites for H2O activation. During vapor phase reforming at 450 degrees C the redox of cobalt, driven by steam oxidation and H-2 reduction, trended to an equilibrium of Co-0/Co2+. ZnO showed no significant effect on cobalt oxidation, inferred from the minor changes of C1 product yield. Surface sites created by ZnO addition enhanced water activation and oxidation of surface carbon species, increasing CO2 selectivity. At 250 degrees C cobalt reduction was minimal, in situ XANES demonstrated that ZnO addition significantly facilitated oxidation of Co-0 under vapor phase reforming conditions, demonstrated by lower C-1 product yield. Sites introduced by ZnO addition improved the COx selectivity at 250 degrees C. Both Co/C and Co-ZnO/C rapidly oxidized under aqueous phase reaction conditions at 250 degrees C, showing negligible activity in aqueous phase reforming. This work suggests that ZnO affects the activation of H2O for Co catalysts in ethanol reforming. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据