4.7 Article

Selective conversion of microcrystalline cellulose into hexitols over a Ru/[Bmim]3PW12O40 catalyst under mild conditions

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 233, 期 -, 页码 70-76

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.09.061

关键词

Ru/[Bmim](3)PW12O40; Cellobiose and cellulose; Hydrogenolysis; Hydrogen spillover; Bronsted acid

资金

  1. Nature Sciences Foundation of China [21076152, 21276191]
  2. Special Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [2100032110018]
  3. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities, China [B06006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A catalyst consisting of dispersed Ru on an ionic liquid (BmimPF(6))-heteropolyacid (H3PW12O40 center dot nH(2)O) hybrid as a support, i.e. Ru/[Bmim](3)PW12O40, has been successfully synthesized. The catalyst, which combines the Ru sites for hydrogenation and both Lewis and Bronsted acidic sites for hydrolysis, exhibits a superior catalytic performance for selective conversion of the microcrystalline cellulose to hexitols over the catalyst of mixing [Bmim](3)PW12O40 and Ru/C. On the Ru/[Bmim](3)PW12O40 catalyst, a sorbitol selectivity of 70.3% with a microcrystalline cellulose conversion of 63.7% was achieved in 24 h at 433 K and 5 MPa H-2. The superior catalytic performance of Ru/[Bmim](3)PW12O40 has been characterized using the hydrogenolysis of cellobiose as a probe reaction and was attributed to the Bronsted acid sites generated from hydrogen spillover from the Ru sites to the O sites of the support. In situ generation of the Bronsted acidic sites through hydrogen spillover has been confirmed by FT-IR characterization of pyridine adsorption. Furthermore, pH changes after treating the catalyst in H-2 demonstrated that dissolution of the protons generated on the oxygen sites as a result of hydrogen spillover acidifies the liquid product. These Bronsted acids work synergistically with the supported Ru and contribute to the enhanced hydrogenolysis activity. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据