4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Preferential CO oxidation over supported noble metal catalysts

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 146, 期 1-2, 页码 253-259

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2009.01.045

关键词

Selective CO oxidation; PROX; Noble metal catalysts; PEMFC; Fuel cell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted a comparative study for the preferential CO oxidation (PROX) over supported noble metal catalysts. The CO chemisorption in the absence and presence of H-2, the O-2 chemisorption, the temperature-programmed oxidation (TPO), the temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) after O-2 chemisorption and the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were conducted to characterize the catalysts. Commercial catalysts such as 1 wt.% Pt/gamma-Al2O3, 0.5 wt.% Ru/gamma-Al2O3, 0.5 wt.% Rh/gamma-Al2O3, 5 wt.% Pt/gamma-Al2O3, 5 wt.% Ru/gamma-Al2O3, and 5 wt.% Rh/gamma-Al2O3 were utilized. Among them, 5 wt.% Ru/gamma-Al2O3 showed the highest PROX activity. This catalyst can be considered to be promising because it can reduce the high inlet CO concentration to be less than 10 ppm at low temperatures where the reverse water-gas shift reaction can be minimized. No detectable amount of chemisorbed O-2 was measured at 373 K over 1 wt.% Pt/gamma-Al2O3, 0.5 wt.% Rh/gamma-Al2O3 and 5 wt.% Pt/gamma-Al2O3. The moderate degree of CO and O-2 chemisorption at reaction temperatures appeared to be essential for the optimum PROX activity. Although 0.5 wt.% Ru/gamma-Al2O3 and 5 wt.% Ru/gamma-Al2O3 have the similar particle size distribution based on TEM analysis, the latter catalyst with smaller amount of chemisorbed CO and O-2 per Ru metal showed much better PROX activity. Based on TPO and TPR result, 0.5 wt.% Ru/gamma-Al2O3 can be oxidized at lower temperatures but can be reduced at higher temperatures compared with 5 wt.% Ru/gamma-Al2O3. Therefore. the easily reducible Ru species can give us the better PROX activity over a wide reaction temperature for Ru catalysts. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据