4.2 Article

Effect of Ni Addition on the Low Temperature Carbon Monoxide Oxidation over Au/HAP Nanocatalyst

期刊

CATALYSIS SURVEYS FROM ASIA
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 208-221

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10563-018-9253-6

关键词

Gold; Nickel; Sintering-resistance; HAP; CO oxidation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21271110 21373120, 21271107]
  2. MOE Innovation Team of China [IRT13022]
  3. Tianjin Key Laboratory for photoelectric Materials and Devices, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supported gold catalysts with their uniquely catalytic properties have found extensive applications. A challenge for gold catalyst research is now to prevent the sintering of gold particles at high temperature maintaining their high activities simultaneously. Herein, Au/Ni-HAP catalyst with high activity and sintering-resistance was prepared by a deposition-precipitation method. Samples were characterized by XRD, TEM, SEM, UV-Vis, ICP, XPS, FT-Raman and O-2-TPD, and their catalytic performance for CO oxidation was tested. TEM results indicated that Au/Ni-HAP catalyst had the smaller gold nanoparticles than Au/HAP catalyst. In UV-Vis spectra, the addition of Ni to Au/HAP catalyst gave rise to larger absorption into visible light, changing the electronic structure of Au/HAP catalyst. Based on XPS studies, nickel existed mainly as NiO in Au/Ni-HAP catalyst, and a small amount of Ni(OH)(2) also was formed in Au/Ni-HAP catalyst. Profiles of O-2-TPD revealed that Au/Ni-HAP catalyst performed bigger adsorption of oxygen and possessed more new oxygen adsorption sites compared with Au/HAP catalyst. Results showed that Au/Ni-HAP catalyst had better catalytic activity and sintering-resistance than Au/HAP catalyst. The enhanced activity could be attributed to the synergistic effect of gold, nickel and HAP in Au/Ni-HAP catalyst, which created plenty of oxygen vacancies and changed the electronic structure of Au/HAP catalyst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据