4.7 Article

Human essential myosin light chain isoforms revealed distinct myosin binding, sarcomeric sorting, and inotropic activity

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 90, 期 3, 页码 513-520

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvr026

关键词

Essential myosin light chains; Heart; Cardiomyocyte contraction

资金

  1. DFG [Mo 362/25-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims In this paper, we tested the hypothesis that different binding affinities of the C-terminus of human cardiac alkali (essential) myosin light chain (A1) isoforms to the IQ1 motif of the myosin lever arm provide a molecular basis for distinct sarcomeric sorting and inotropic activity. Methods and results We employed circular dichroism and surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy to investigate structural properties, secondary structures, and protein-protein interactions of a recombinant head-rod fragments of rat cardiac beta-myosin heavy chain aa664-915 with alanine-mutated IQ2 domain (r beta-MYH(664-915)IQ(ala4)) and A1 isoforms [human atrial (hALC1) and human ventricular (hVLC-1) light chains]. Double epitope-tagging competition was used to monitor the intracellular localization of exogenously introduced hALC-1 and hVLC-1 constructs in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Contractile functions of A1 isoforms were investigated by monitoring shortening and intracellular-free Ca2+ (Fura-2) of adult rat cardiomyocytes infected with adenoviral (Ad) vectors using hALC-1 or beta-galactosidase as expression cassettes. hALC-1 bound more strongly (greater than three-fold lower K-D) to r beta-MYH664-915 than did hVLC-1. Sorting specificity of A1 isoforms to sarcomeres of cardiomyocytes rose in the order hVLC-1 to hALC-1. Replacement of endogenous VLC-1 by hALC-1 in adult rat cardiomyocytes increased contractility while the systolic Ca2+ signal remained unchanged. Conclusion Intense myosin binding of hALC-1 provides a mechanism for preferential sarcomeric sorting and Ca2+-independent positive inotropic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据