4.7 Article

HIV gp120 induces endothelial dysfunction in tumour necrosis factor-α-activated porcine and human endothelial cells

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 87, 期 2, 页码 366-374

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvq013

关键词

HIV gp120; Endothelial dysfunction; eNOS; ICAM-1; TNF-alpha

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL065916, HL083471]
  2. Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to determine direct effects and potential molecular mechanisms of HIV gp120, a viral envelope glycoprotein, on endothelial function. Fresh porcine coronary artery rings and human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs) were treated with recombinant HIV gp120 for 16 h with or without pretreatment with tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) (8 h). With a myograph tension analysis, HIV gp120 with TNF-alpha pretreatment significantly decreased endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in response to bradykinin in porcine coronary artery rings compared with untreated control vessels. In addition, HIV gp120 with TNF-alpha pretreatment significantly reduced endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression-both mRNA and protein levels-in porcine coronary artery rings and HCAECs compared with untreated controls. Furthermore, TNF-alpha pretreatment substantially increased intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression in artery rings and HCAECs. Anti-gp120 or anti-ICAM-1 antibody significantly blocked these effects of HIV gp120. Silencing of ICAM-1 by siRNA oligonucleotides significantly blocked the effect of gp120 on eNOS downregulation in TNF-alpha-pretreated HCAECs. HIV gp120 and TNF-alpha synergistically reduce eNOS expression and cause endothelial dysfunction in both porcine coronary arteries and HCAECs. ICAM-1 induced by TNF-alpha pretreatment may mediate HIV gp120-induced endothelial dysfunction, which suggests a novel molecular mechanism of HIV gp120-ICAM-1 interaction inducing endothelial dysfunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据