4.7 Article

Activation of prostaglandin E2 EP1 receptor increases arteriolar tone and blood pressure in mice with type 2 diabetes

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 83, 期 1, 页码 148-154

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvp098

关键词

Diabetes; Hypertension; Arteriole; Prostanoid; EP receptor

资金

  1. NIH [PO1-HL-43023, HL-46813]
  2. American Heart Association [0735540T]
  3. Hungarian Ministry of Health [449/2006, 454/2006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Type 2 diabetes mellitus is frequently associated with hypertension, but the underlying mechanisms are not completely understood. We tested the hypothesis that activation of type 1 prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) receptor (EP1) increases skeletal muscle arteriolar tone and blood pressure in mice with type 2 diabetes. Methods and results In 12-week-old, male db/db mice (with homozygote mutation in leptin receptor), systolic blood pressure was significantly elevated, compared with control heterozygotes. Isolated, pressurized gracilis muscle arterioles (similar to 90 mu m) of db/db mice exhibited an enhanced pressure-and angiotensin II (0.1-10 nM)-induced tone, which was reduced by the selective EP1 receptor antagonist, AH6809 (10 mu M), to the level observed in arterioles of control mice. Exogenous application of PGE(2) (10 pM-100 nM) or the selective agonist of the EP1 receptor, 17-phenyl-trinor-PGE(2) (10 pM-100 nM), elicited arteriolar constrictions that were significantly enhanced in db/db mice (max: 31 +/- 4 and 29 +/- 5%), compared with controls (max: 20 +/- 2 and 14 +/- 3%, respectively). In the aorta of db/db mice, an increased protein expression of EP1, but not EP4, receptor was also detected by western immunoblotting. Moreover, we found that oral administration of the EP1 receptor antagonist, AH6809 (10 mg/kg/day, for 4 days), significantly reduced the systolic blood pressure in db/db, but not in control mice. Conclusion Activation of EP1 receptors increases arteriolar tone, which could contribute to the development of hypertension in the db/db mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据