4.6 Article

Increased expression of Slug and Vimentin as novel predictive biomarkers for lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in colorectal cancer

期刊

CARCINOGENESIS
卷 34, 期 11, 页码 2548-2557

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgt282

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan [B: 23791525]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Slug and Vimentin genes play a critical role in regulating epithelialmesenchymal transition (EMT) via downregulation of epithelial markers and upregulation of mesenchymal markers. The present study evaluated the clinical significance of Slug and Vimentin expression as potential disease biomarkers in colorectal cancer (CRC). At first, the biological role of Slug in CRC was assessed by RNA interference in CRC cell lines to assess tumor progression, invasion and migration. Next, we analyzed Slug and Vimentin expression in surgical tissue specimens from 181 CRC patients (Cohort 1) by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptionPCR and 208 patients (Cohort 2) by immunohistochemistry. Knockdown of Slug using small interfering RNA in CRC cell lines resulted in inhibition of EMT, reduced cell proliferation, invasion and migration in CRC cells. Interestingly, Slug and Vimentin expression in cancer tissues was significantly higher in patients with higher T stage, lymph node involvement, liver metastasis and advanced tumor node metastasis stages. A significant correlation was observed between Slug and Vimentin expression in CRC (messenger RNA: ? 0.546, protein: ? 0.405), and increased expression of Slug and Vimentin was significantly associated with poor prognosis. Furthermore, increased expression of Slug emerged as an independent prognostic factor and a predictive marker of lymph node metastasis in CRC patients. Our data provide novel evidence for the biological and clinical significance of Slug and Vimentin expression as potential predictive biomarkers for identifying patients with lymph node metastasis or poor prognosis in CRC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据