4.6 Article

Tumor promotion through the mesenchymal stem cell compartment in human hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

CARCINOGENESIS
卷 34, 期 10, 页码 2330-2340

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgt210

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [VENI-916-13-032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the infiltration of mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells (MSCs) into different tumors is widely recognized in animal models, the question whether these MSCs have a positive or negative effect on disease progression remains unanswered. The aim of this study is to investigate whether human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) harbors MSCs and whether these MSCs affect tumor growth. We observed that cells capable of differentiation into both adipocyte and osteocyte lineages and expressing MSC markers can be cultured from surgically resected HCC tissues. In situ staining of human HCC tissues with a STRO-1 antibody showed that the tumor and tumor-stromal region are significantly enriched with candidate MSCs compared with adjacent tissue (n 12, P < 0.01). In mice, coengraftment of a human HCC cell line (Huh7) with MSCs resulted in substantially larger tumors compared with paired engraftment of Huh7 alone (n 8, P < 0.01). Consistently, coculturing Huh7 with irradiated MSCs significantly increased the number and the size of colonies formed. This enhancement of Huh7 colony formation was also observed by treatment of MSC-conditioned medium (MSC-CM), suggesting that secreted trophic factors contribute to the growth-promoting effects. Genome-wide gene expression array and pathway analysis confirmed the upregulation of cell growth and proliferation-related processes and downregulation of cell death-related pathways by treatment of MSC-CM in Huh7 cells. In conclusion, these results show that MSCs are enriched in human HCC tumor compartment and could exert trophic effects on tumor cells. Thus, targeting of HCC tumor MSCs may represent a new avenue for therapeutic intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据