4.6 Article

Acetylated Sp1 inhibits PTEN expression through binding to PTEN core promoter and recruitment of HDAC1 and promotes cancer cell migration and invasion

期刊

CARCINOGENESIS
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 58-67

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgs336

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry [2006-331]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81070849]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Specificity protein 1 (Sp1) is often overexpressed in cancer cells. Its binding sites are known to exist in the phosphatase and tension homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) promoter. In this study, we hypothesized that Sp1 negatively regulates PTEN expression. We used several cell lines to determine the effects of Sp1. The results showed that Sp1 overexpression inhibited the expression and promoter activity of PTEN and correspondingly upregulated AKT phosphorylation, whereas Sp1 knockdown upregulated the expression and promoter ability of PTEN and downregulated AKT phosphorylation. Moreover, a series of deletion and site-directed mutations of the PTEN promoter indicated that Sp1 can inhibit PTEN promoter activity through a specific Sp1-binding site at the PTEN core promoter in vivo. Meanwhile, non-acetylated Sp1, with its loss of DNA binding activity, failed to inhibit the expression and promoter activity of PTEN. Histone deacetylase 1 was necessary for Sp1 to inhibit PTEN expression. The inverse expression of Sp1 and PTEN was found in tongue cancer cells and salivary adenoid cystic cancer (SACC)-LM cells (possessing higher potential for lung metastasis than SACC-83) as compared with that in adjacent normal tissue and SACC-83 cells, respectively. Sp1 knockdown decreased the migration and invasion of SACC-LM cells, whereas Sp1 overexpression increased the migration and invasion of SACC-83 cells. Overall, these results suggest that Sp1 is involved in the development and invasiveness of cancer through inhibition of PTEN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据