4.6 Article

Novel single nucleotide polymorphism associations with colorectal cancer on chromosome 8q24 in African and European Americans

期刊

CARCINOGENESIS
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 1353-1357

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgp123

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Cancer Research Foundation
  2. Department of Medicine at the University of Chicago
  3. Digestive Disease Research Core Center [P30 DK42086]
  4. National Institutes of Health [1F32CA132493]
  5. Department of Defense [W81XWH-07-1-0203]
  6. University of Chicago Cancer Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regions on chromosome 8q24 harbor susceptibility alleles for multiple cancers including colorectal (region 3) and prostate cancer (regions 1-4). The objectives of the present study were (i) to test whether single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in region 4 are associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) in European or African Americans; (ii) to test whether 8q24 SNPs previously shown to be associated with colorectal and prostate cancer also show association in our multiethnic series and (iii) to test for association between 100 ancestry informative markers (AIMs) and CRC in both the African American and European American cohorts. In total, we genotyped nine markers on 8q24 and 100 unlinked AIMs in 569 CRC cases and 439 controls (490 European Americans and 518 African Americans) obtained retrospectively from a hospital-based sample. We found rs7008482 in 8q24 region 4 to be significantly associated with CRC in European Americans (P = 0.03). Also in region 4, we found that a second SNP, rs16900305, trended toward association with CRC in African Americans. The rs6983267 in region 3, previously implicated in CRC risk, trended toward association with disease in European Americans but not in African Americans. Finally, none of the 100 AIMs tested for association reached statistical significance after correction for multiple hypothesis testing. In summary, these results are evidence that 8q24 region 4 contains novel CRC-associated alleles in European and African Americans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据