4.6 Article

Deficient deletion of apoptotic cells by macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) overexpression accelerates photocarcinogenesis

期刊

CARCINOGENESIS
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 1597-1605

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgp160

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan [20591337]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20591337] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic ultraviolet (UV) exposure can increase the occurrence of p53 mutations, thus leading to a dysregulation of apoptosis and the initiation of skin cancer. Therefore, it is extremely important that apoptosis is induced quickly after UV irradiation, without any dysregulation. Recent studies have suggested a potentially broader role for macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in growth regulation via its ability to antagonize p53-mediated gene activation and apoptosis. To further elucidate the possible role of MIF in photocarcinogenesis, the acute and chronic UVB effect in the skin was examined using macrophage migration inhibitory factor transgenic (MIF Tg) and wild-type (WT) mice. The MIF Tg mice exposed to chronic UVB irradiation began to develop skin tumors after similar to 14 weeks, whereas the WT mice began to develop tumors after 18 weeks. A higher incidence of tumors was observed in the MIF Tg in comparison with the WT mice after chronic UVB irradiation. Next, we clarified whether the acceleration of photo-induced carcinogenesis in the MIF Tg mice was mediated by the inhibition of apoptosis There were fewer sunburned cells in the epidermis of the MIF Tg mice than the WT mice after acute UVB exposure. The epidermis derived from the MIF Tg mice exhibited substantially decreased levels of p53, bax and p21 after UVB exposure in comparison with the WT mice. Collectively, these findings suggest that chronic UVB exposure enhances MIF production, which may inhibit the p53-dependent apoptotic processes and thereby induce photocarcinogenesis in the skin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据