4.5 Article

Pretreatment of microcrystalline cellulose flakes with CaCl2 increases the surface area, and thus improves enzymatic saccharification

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE RESEARCH
卷 343, 期 7, 页码 1232-1236

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2008.03.007

关键词

cellulose; calcium chloride; cellulase; cellobiohydrolase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucose production from cellulose flakes with cellulases was improved after pretreatment with saturated CaCh at room temperature. When pretreated microcrystalline cellulose flakes (Funacel II, Funakoshi Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) were saccharified with the cellulases, 76.8% of the substrate was converted into glucose within 5 h, whereas the corresponding conversion rate of water-pretreated cellulose flakes was 33.8%. To clarify the mechanism of the promotion, cellobiohydrolase I purified from Trichoderma longibrachiatum was used as the model cellulase, which degraded CaCl(2),-pretreated cellulose more quickly than the water-pretreated cellulose under tested conditions. The maximum amount of the enzyme bound to CaCl(2)-pretreated cellulose at 37 degrees C was estimated as 1.14 nmol/mg of cellulose, whereas that to water-pretreated cellulose was 0.527 nmol/mg of cellulose. The specific activity of the bound enzyme greatly decreased with the increase of the surface density (p) of the bound enzyme, and no significant positive effects of the CaCl(2)-pretreatment on the specific activity could be observed at the same p value, suggesting that the promotion was attributed mainly to the increase of the surface area of cellulose. The effect was also observed with dewaxed cotton or filter paper, but not with nata de coco cellulose or bagasse cellulose as the substrates. This suggests that the CaCl(2)-pretreatment serves to increase the surface area of cellulose flakes via liberation of cellulose particles which were artificially aggregated during harsh drying processes of the flakes. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据