4.5 Article

Downregulating hypoxia-inducible factor-2a improves the efficacy of doxorubicin in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 103, 期 3, 页码 528-534

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02177.x

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [30872987, 30973474, 30972938]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hypoxic microenvironment inside solid tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is a major cause of tumor resistance to chemotherapy. The recently identified hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-2 executes the hypoxia response. Its expression feature and transcriptional targets indicate a possible dominance of HIF-2 in regulating genes in HCC. The aim of the present study was to determine whether transfection of siRNA targeting HIF-2a could enhance the efficacy of doxorubicin, the most commonly used drug in the treatment of HCC. Transfection of HIF-2 siRNA into human HCC cells downregulated the expression of HIF-2a, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor (TGF)-a, and cyclin D1, but had little effect on the expression of HIF-1a, fms-related tyrosine kinase-1 (Flt-1), the glucose transporter (GLUT)-1, and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA). Doxorubicin itself only downregulated VEGF expression. Furthermore, HIF-2 siRNA inhibited proliferation, induced cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase, and acted synergistically with doxorubicin to inhibit the growth of human HCC cells in vitro. Transfection of HIF-2 siRNA also downregulated tumoral expression of HIF-2a, VEGF, TGF-a, and cyclin D1 in vivo, and acted synergistically with doxorubicin to suppress the growth of HepG2 tumors established in immunodeficient mice by inhibiting cell proliferation, tumor angiogenesis and microvessel perfusion. The results of the present study suggest that targeting HIF-2a with siRNA warrants investigation as a potential strategy to enhance the efficacy of doxorubicin in the treatment of HCC. (Cancer Sci 2012; 103: 528534)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据