4.5 Article

Transforming growth factor-beta signaling at the tumor-bone interface promotes mammary tumor growth and osteoclast activation

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 100, 期 1, 页码 71-81

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.01012.x

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health and Nebraska Research Initiative Molecular Therapeutics Program [CA71781, P30CA036727]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA036727] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the cellular and molecular changes in the bone microenvironment is important for developing novel therapeutics to control breast cancer bone metastasis. Although the underlying mechanism(s) of bone metastasis has been the focus of intense investigation, relatively little is known about complex molecular interactions between malignant cells and bone stroma. Using a murine syngeneic model that mimics osteolytic changes associated with human breast cancer, we examined the role of tumor-bone interaction in tumor-induced osteolysis and malignant growth in the bone microenvironment. We identified transforming growth factor-beta receptor 1 (TGF-beta RI) as a commonly upregulated gene at the tumor-bone (TB) interface. Moreover, TGF-beta RI expression and activation, analyzed by nuclear localization of phospho-Smad2, was higher in tumor cells and osteoclasts at the TB interface as compared to the tumor-alone area. Furthermore, attenuation of TGF-beta activity by neutralizing antibody to TGF-beta or TGF-beta RI kinase inhibitor reduced mammary tumor-induced osteolysis, TGF-beta RI expression and its activation. In addition, we demonstrate a potential role of TGF-beta as an important modifier of receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand (RANKL)-dependent osteoclast activation and osteolysis. Together, these studies demonstrate that inhibition of TGF-beta RI signaling at the TB interface will be a therapeutic target in the treatment of breast cancer-induced osteolysis. (Cancer Sci 2009; 100: 71-81).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据