4.8 Article

p53-Dependent BRCA1 Nuclear Export Controls Cellular Susceptibility to DNA Damage

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 71, 期 16, 页码 5546-5557

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3423

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH [R01 CA118158-02]
  2. Vanderbilt CTSA [UL1 RR024975]
  3. University of Alabama-Birmingham School of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subcellular localization regulates BRCA1 function, and BRCA1 is exported to the cytoplasm following DNA damage in a p53-dependent manner. Because more than 50% of solid tumors harbor p53 mutations, it is possible that genetically wild-type (wt) BRCA1 is functionally abnormal through compromised nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling in sporadic breast cancer patients with dysfunctional p53. In this study, we have investigated the mechanisms of p53-dependent BRCA1 subcellular distribution and DNA damage-induced nuclear export, as well as the impact on the resulting cytotoxic response to therapy in human breast cancer. We first show that p53 mediates BRCA1 nuclear export via protein-protein binding, rather than by modulation of its transcription. Furthermore, it is the C-terminal (BRCT) region of BRCA1 that is critical for its interaction with p53, and p53 may promote BRCA1 nuclear export by interrupting the association of BRCA1 with BARD1. In sporadic breast cancer specimens, dysfunctional p53 strongly correlates with nuclear retention of sequence-verified wt BRCA1. This p53-dependent BRCA1 shuttling determines cellular susceptibility to DNA damage as augmentation of cytosolic BRCA1 significantly enhances cancer cell susceptibility to ionizing radiation. Taken together, our data suggest that p53 dysfunction compromises nuclear export of wt BRCA1 as a mechanism to increase cellular resistance to DNA damage in sporadic breast cancer. We propose that targeting nuclear BRCA1 to the cytoplasm may offer a unique strategy to sensitize p53-deficient sporadic breast cancers to DNA damage-based therapy. Cancer Res; 71(16); 5546-57. (c) 2011 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据