4.8 Article

Comparison of Increased Aromatase versus ERα in the Generation of Mammary Hyperplasia and Cancer

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 71, 期 16, 页码 5477-5487

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4652

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute, NIH [1R01CA112176]
  2. National Cancer Institute Research Supplements to Promote Diversity in Health-Related Research
  3. Susan G. Komen for the Cure Postdoctoral Fellowship [KG080359]
  4. DoD [W81XWH-08-1-0610]
  5. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [R31-10069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Factors associated with increased estrogen synthesis increase breast cancer risk. Increased aromatase and estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) in both normal epithelium and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions are found in conjunction with breast cancer, leading to the idea that altered estrogen signaling pathways predispose the mammary gland to cancer development. Here, we developed a transgenic mouse that conditionally expresses aromatase in the mammary gland, and used it along with a deregulated ER alpha expression model to investigate the molecular pathways involved in the development of mammary gland preneoplasia and carcinoma. Both increased ER alpha and aromatase expression led to the development of preneoplasia, but increased preneoplasia, in addition to carcinoma, was found in aromatase overexpressing mice. Increased prevalence of mammary pathologic changes in mice expressing aromatase correlated with increased cyclin E and cyclin-dependent kinase 2 expression. Gain of both ER alpha and aromatase increased expression of ER alpha and progesterone receptor, but aromatase produced a higher increase than ER alpha, accompanied by higher levels of downstream target genes Ccnd1, Myc, and Tnfsf11. In summary, whereas gain of both ER alpha and aromatase activate abnormal growth pathways in the mammary gland, aromatase induced a wider range of abnormalities that was associated with a higher prevalence of mammary preneoplasia and cancer progression. Cancer Res; 71(16); 5477-87. (c) 2011 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据