4.8 Article

ANCCA/ATAD2 Overexpression Identifies Breast Cancer Patients with Poor Prognosis, Acting to Drive Proliferation and Survival of Triple-Negative Cells through Control of B-Myb and EZH2

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 70, 期 22, 页码 9402-9412

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1199

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH [R01CA113860, R01DK060019]
  2. Department of Defense [W81XWH-0810689]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chromatin coregulators are important factors in tumorigenesis and cancer progression. ANCCA is an AAA+ ATPase and a bromodomain-containing nuclear coactivator for the estrogen and androgen receptors that is crucial for assembly of chromatin-modifying complexes and proliferation of hormone-responsive cancer cells. In this study, we show that ANCCA is overexpressed in >70% of breast tumors and that its high protein level correlates well with tumor histologic grades (P < 0.0001), highlighting ANCCA as a prognostic factor for poor overall survival and disease recurrence. Strikingly, high-level ANCCA correlated with triple-negative tumors that represent highly aggressive disease. Analysis of ANCCA transcript levels in multiple expression profiles of breast cancer identified ANCCA as a common signature gene, indicating that elevated transcripts also strongly correlate with tumor metastasis and poor survival. Biological and mechanistic investigations revealed that ANCCA is crucial for proliferation and survival of triple-negative/basal-like cancer cells and that it controls the expression of B-Myb, histone methyltransferase EZH2, and an Rb-E2F core program for proliferation, along with a subset of key mitotic kinesins and cell survival genes (IRS2, VEGF, and Akt1). In particular, ANCCA overexpression correlated strongly with EZH2 in tumors. Our results suggest that ANCCA may integrate multiple oncogenic programs in breast cancer, serving in particular as a prognostic marker and a therapeutic target for triple-negative cancers. Cancer Res; 70(22); 9402-12. (C) 2010 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据