4.4 Article

Examination of Whole Blood DNA Methylation as a Potential Risk Marker for Gastric Cancer

期刊

CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH
卷 6, 期 10, 页码 1093-1100

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0034

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH [CA158112 and CA098006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whole blood DNAmethylation analysis has been proposed to be a risk marker for cancer that can be used to target patients for preventive interventions. To test this, we examined whole bloodDNAmethylation of 16 CpG island promoters and LINE1 repetitive element in patients with gastric cancer and control subjects. Bisulfite pyrosequencing was used to quantify the methylation of 14 CpG island promoters (MINT25, RORA, GDNF, CDH1, RARAB2, ER, CDH13, MYOD1, SFRP1, P2RX7, SLC16A12, IGF2, DPYS, and N33) and LINE1 from 72 patients with gastric cancer, 67 control, and 52 healthy young individuals. Quantitative methylation-specific real-time PCR was also conducted for 3 CpG island promoters (MINT25, MYO3A, and SOX11). Among all sites tested, only a marginal increase in the methylation of the SFRP1 promoter was observed in the blood of patients with gastric cancer when compared with the control group (11.3 % vs 10.5%; age-adjusted P value: P = 0.009), and this association was also seen in a validation set of 91 patients with gastric cancer (11.5% vs 10.5%; age-adjusted P value: P = 0.001). The methylation of 9 sites (GDNF, CDH1, RARAB2, CDH13, MYOD1, SFRP1, SLC16A12, DPYS, N33, and LINE1) and their mean Z score was correlated with higher age (R = 0.41, P < 0.0001) and marginally with telomere shortening (R = 0.18, P = 0.01) but not with gastric cancer risk (other than SFRP1 methylation). Variability in whole blood DNA methylation of cancer markers is primarily associated with aging, reflecting turnover of white blood cells, and has no direct link to gastric cancer predisposition. SFRP1 methylation in whole blood may be associated with gastric cancer risk. (C)2013 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据