4.7 Article

Low dose histone deacetylase inhibitor, LBH589, potentiates anticancer effect of docetaxel in epithelial ovarian cancer via PI3K/Akt pathway in vitro

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 329, 期 1, 页码 17-26

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.08.035

关键词

LBH589 (panobinostat); Epithelial ovarian cancer; Docetaxel (DTX); Combination therapy; Apoptosis

类别

资金

  1. International Collaborative Grant from Henan Health Board, China
  2. National Health & Medical Research Council (NH & MRC) Career Development Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of combination of LBH589 with docetaxel (DTX) on the growth and survival of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cells in vitro and the possible mechanisms of chemo-sensitization of LBH589 in the combination treatment. The effect of LBH589 alone or in combination with DTX on four EOC cell lines (OVCAR-3, IGROV-1, A2780 and SKOV-3) was studied by MTT and clonogenic assays, acridine orange (AO)/ethidium bromide (EB) staining for apoptosis, Western blotting for apoptosis-related proteins, histone H3 and H4 proteins, DNA double strand break (DSB) repair marker and phosphorylation of Akt. LBH589 alone inhibited EOC cell proliferation in a time and dose-dependent manner. Low-dose of LBH589 (IC20) combined with DTX had an additive effect and greatly improved efficacy of DTX cell killing in EOC cells. Compared to DTX alone, the combination treatment with LBH589 and DTX induced more apoptosis and led to an increased and persistent DSB. Cell death following single or combined treatment was associated with the release of cytochrome c activity, increased caspase-3 (active) and PARP-1(cleaved), histone acetylation-related proteins and PI3k/Akt signaling pathway. Our results suggest that LBH589 enhances DTX-induced apoptosis in human EOC cells, and can be used in combination with DTX as an attractive strategy for treating human EOC. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据