4.7 Article

A small oxazine compound as an anti-tumor agent: A novel pyranoside mimetic that binds to VEGF, HB-EGF, and TNF-α

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 297, 期 2, 页码 231-243

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.05.016

关键词

Tumor metastases; Heparin; Growth factors; Oxazines; Sugar mimetics

类别

资金

  1. Indian National Science Academy (INSA)-Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  2. JSPS [19-07194]
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (MEXT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel pyranoside mimetic compound, DMBO (2-(2,6-difluorophenyl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-oxa-3-azaspiro[5.5]undecane), was designed and synthesized. The sugar mimicking behavior of DMBO was addressed by its ability to bind several growth factors/cytokines such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha as demonstrated by the recently developed surface plasmon resonance assay. DMBO exhibited strong anti-proliferation activity in vitro against tumor cells including a highly metastatic murine osteosarcoma cell line LM8G7 that secretes VEGF as well as two human ovarian cell lines, OVSAHO and SKOV-3, which secrete TNF-alpha and HB-EGF respectively. Furthermore, DMBO inhibited the metastatic activity to the mouse liver of LM8G7 cells injected from a lateral tail vein, and affected the heparan-degrading activity of LM8G7 cells. Here, we report that DMBO acts as a human heparanase inhibitor in vitro possibly as a substrate mimetic. DMBO also inhibited the migration and invasion of LM8G7 cells and angiogenic events such as endothelial cell proliferation, migration and capillary tube-like formation in vitro. More prominently, the administration of DMBO with heparin resulted in synergistic anti-tumor effects in mouse model of osteosarcoma. These preclinical data shows the potential anti-cancer effects of DMBO. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据