4.7 Article

Evaluation of liposomal clodronate for treatment of malignant histiocytosis in dogs

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 59, 期 3, 页码 441-452

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-009-0763-y

关键词

Cancer; Immune; Bisphosphonate; Macrophage; Dendritic cell

资金

  1. Canine Health Foundation
  2. NIH Training [T32 RR00707]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignant histiocytosis (MH) is an aggressive cancer derived from myeloid lineage cells in both dogs and humans. In dogs, the tumor is characterized by the rapid development of metastatic tumors in multiple sites, including especially the lungs and lymph nodes. Humans develop an analogous disease known as Langerhans cell histiocytosis, which primarily affects children and young adults. Because these tumors are often resistant to conventional chemotherapy, there is a need for newer therapeutic approaches. Systemic administration of liposomal clodronate (LC) has been shown to effectively deplete phagocytic cells (e.g., macrophages and dendritic cells) in mice. We investigated therefore whether LC could also be used to treat naturally occurring MH in dogs. First, the susceptibility of canine MH cells to LC-mediated killing was assessed in vitro. Then the clinical safety and effectiveness of LC as a treatment for MH was assessed in a pilot study in five pet dogs with spontaneous MH. We found that canine MH cells were very susceptible to LC-induced apoptotic cell death, whereas other tumor cell lines were resistant to killing by LC. Studies using labeled liposomes demonstrated that susceptibility to LC killing was directly related to the efficiency of liposome uptake. In pet dogs with spontaneous MH, we found that a short course of LC treatment elicited significant tumor regression in two of five treated animals. These findings suggest that liposomal delivery of clodronate and possibly other bisphosphonates may offer an effective new approach to treatment of histiocytic neoplasms in dogs and humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据