4.6 Article

Comparison of distribution and activity of nanoparticles with short interfering DNA (Dbait) in various living systems

期刊

CANCER GENE THERAPY
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 695-706

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/cgt.2011.39

关键词

siDNA; PEI; cholesterol; irradiation; antitumoral

资金

  1. Institut Curie
  2. Centre National de la Recherche (CNRS)
  3. Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle
  4. Genopole (Evry)
  5. FP6 funding (BioEmergences NEST programme)
  6. ARC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introducing small DNA molecules (Dbait) impairs the repair of damaged chromosomes and provides a new method for enhancing the efficiency of radiotherapy in radio-resistant tumors. The radiosensitizing activity is dependent upon the efficient delivery of Dbait molecules into the tumor cells. Different strategies have been compared, to improve this key step. We developed a pipeline of assays to select the most efficient nanoparticles and administration protocols before preclinical assays: (i) molecular analyses of complexes formed with Dbait molecules, (ii) cellular tests for Dbait uptake and activity, (iii) live zebrafish embryo confocal microscopy monitoring for in vivo distribution and biological activity of the nanoparticles and (iv) tumor growth and survival measurement on mice with xenografted tumors. Two classes of nanoparticles were compared, polycationic polymers with linear or branched polyethylenimine (PEI) and covalently attached cholesterol (coDbait). The most efficient Dbait transfection was observed with linear PEI complexes, in vitro and in vivo. Doses of coDbait ten-fold higher than PEI/Dbait nanoparticles, and pretreatment with chloroquine, were required to obtain the same antitumoral effect on xenografted melanoma. However, with a 22-fold lower 'efficacy dose/toxicity dose' ratio as compared with Dbait/PEI, coDbait was selected for clinical trials. Cancer Gene Therapy (2011) 18, 695-706; doi: 10.1038/cgt.2011.39; published online 29 July 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据