4.7 Article

The effect of electrode size and surface heterogeneity on electrochemical properties of ultrananocrystalline diamond microelectrode

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 756, 期 -, 页码 61-68

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.08.016

关键词

Diamond; Nanocrystalline; Electrochemical; Impedance spectroscopy; Kinetics; Microelectrode

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) [1R43ES022344-01]
  2. Louisiana Board of Regents-RCS support fund [LEQSF(2014-17)-RD-A-07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report here the effect of electrode size on electrochemical properties of boron-doped ultrananocrystalline diamond (UNCD) microelectrodes using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). By reducing microelectrode size from 250-mu m to 10-mu m diameter (D), the shape of impedance spectra changes from linear line to two-arcs. The fitting of experimental data to electrochemical circuit model suggests that each arc likely corresponds to UNCD grains and grain boundary phases. The two phases become separable as a result of microelectrode size reduction. In addition, for D <= 100-mu m, microstructural and morphological defects/heterogeneities of grain boundaries and the presence of surface oxygen are also revealed in the spectra. The microelectrode size reduction specifically affect the impedance of the grain boundaries, e.g. for ultramicroelectrodes, UMEs (D <= 25-mu m), as the grain boundary impedance increases by similar to 30-fold. Thus, at UMEs, the grain-grain boundary properties are revealed more sensitively in the spectra. Atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy and surface profilometry measurements were performed to study the influence of microfabrication on surface properties. A significant increase in surface roughness after microfabrication shows that heterogeneities as observed in the spectra are not only due to intrinsic UNCD properties but also arises from microfabrication. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据