4.5 Article

Gene Methylation in Breast Ductal Fluid from BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

期刊

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 265-274

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0359

关键词

-

资金

  1. Goodman Fielder National Breast Cancer Foundation
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
  3. NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Genomic alterations (including gene hypermethylation) are likely to precede the phenotypic changes associated with breast tumorigenesis. From a prospective collection Of ductal lavage (DL) samples from women with a known mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2, we have assessed promoter methylation with a comparison of results with several variables, including breast cancer (BC) Outcome. Experimental Design: Hypermethylation of p16, RASSF1A, twist, and RAR beta was assessed using a qualitative, real-time, nested PCR assay. Associations between methylation status and variables were tested using Fisher's exact test or logistic regression. Analyses were done at three levels: a single breast, a single duct (both over time), and each DL sample in isolation. Results: A total of 168 samples from 93 ducts in 54 breasts have been analyzed in 34 women (16 BRCA1 and 18 BRCA2 mutation carriers). A median of 2 DL was done (range, 1-5), with 7 women developing BC on study, I bilateral. Methylation of p16 was associated with a known BRCA1 mutation (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001 for breast, duct, and sample levels, respectively) and women with a history of contralateral BC (P 0.001 and P < 0.001 for duct and sample levels, respectively). An association was seen for women who developed BC on study and RASSF1A methylation (P = 0.001 for sample level). Conclusions: Genetic methylation patterns could potentially be used to predict future BC risk. In addition, p16 methylation may be a predictor of BRCA1 mutation status. Further research is required to corroborate these findings. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev: 19(1): 265-74. (C)2010 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据