4.4 Article

Resistance to the antiproliferative effect induced by a short-chain ceramide is associated with an increase of glucosylceramide synthase, P-glycoprotein, and multidrug-resistance gene-1 in cervical cancer cells

期刊

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 74, 期 4, 页码 809-817

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-014-2552-3

关键词

Ceramide; Glycosylation; Glucosylceramide; Glucosylceramide synthase; Lactosylceramide; P-gp; Proliferation

资金

  1. CONACyT [182341]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ceramide is glycosylated to glucosylceramide or lactosylceramide, and this glycosylation is a novel multidrug-resistance (MDR) mechanism. In this work, a short-chain ceramide (C6), lactosylceramide (LacCer), and an inhibitor of ceramide glycosylation (d-threo-1-phenyl-2-decanoylamino-3-1-propanol, PDMP) were evaluated on the proliferation of cervical cancer cells. The participation of glucosylceramide synthase (GCS), P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and multidrug-resistance gene-1 (MDR-1) in the resistance to the antiproliferative effect induced by C6 was also evaluated. Cell proliferation was determined by crystal violet staining. GCS and MDR-1 mRNA expression was evaluated by real-time RT-PCR assay. GCS and P-gp protein expressions, as well as Rhodamine 123 uptake, which is a functional test for P-gp efflux activity, were determined by flow cytometry. C6 inhibited proliferation of CaLo and CasKi cells with an IC50 of 2.5 mu M; however, 50 % proliferation of ViBo cells was inhibited with 10 mu M. LacCer increased the proliferation of all cells. When cells were treated with PDMP plus C6, no additional effect on antiproliferation induced by C6 was observed in CaLo and CasKi cells; however, proliferation diminished in comparison with C6 alone in ViBo cells. C6 increased GCS and MDR-1 expression in all cells, as well as P-gp expression in CasKi cells. Cells that have more capacity to glycosylate ceramide and express a higher level of GCS, MDR-1, and P-gp, are more resistant to the antiproliferative effect induced by C6.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据