4.4 Article

The effect of rifampicin, a prototypical CYP3A4 inducer, on erlotinib pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects

期刊

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 73, 期 3, 页码 613-621

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-014-2390-3

关键词

Erlotinib; Pharmacokinetics; Rifampicin; CYP3A4; Dose adjustment

资金

  1. F-Hoffman La Roche
  2. OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Erlotinib, N-(3-ethynylphenyl)-6,7-bis(2-methoxyethoxy) quinazolin-4-amine is approved for the treatment for non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer. Because erlotinib is metabolized predominately by CYP3A4, co-administration of compounds that increase CYP3A4 activity may alter the efficacy and safety of erlotinib therapy. Two phase I studies were conducted in healthy male subjects to evaluate the effect of pre- or co-administered rifampicin, a CYP3A4 inducer, on the pharmacokinetics of erlotinib. Study 1 included Groups A (erlotinib 150 mg days 1 and 15, rifampicin 600 mg days 8-14) and B (erlotinib 150 mg days 1 and 15) in a parallel group study design. Study 2 subjects received erlotinib 150 mg day 1, erlotinib 450 mg day 15, and rifampicin 600 mg days 8-18. The primary endpoint in each study was the ratio of exposure (AUC(0-a) and C (max)) between days 1 and 15. Urinary cortisol metabolic induction ratios were determined in Study 1 for Group A subjects only. In Study 1, the geometric mean ratios of AUC(0-a) and C (max) were 33 and 71 %, respectively, and the mean cortisol metabolic index increased from 7.4 to 27.0, suggesting cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme induction. In Study 2, the geometric mean ratios for AUC(0-a) and C (max) were 19 and 34 % (when dose adjusted from 450 to 150 mg erlotinib), respectively, a greater relative decrease than observed in Study 1. Erlotinib exposure (AUC(0-a) and C (max)) was reduced after pre- or concomitant dosing with rifampicin. Doses of a parts per thousand yen450 mg erlotinib may be necessary to compensate for concomitant medications with strong CYP3A4 enzyme induction effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据