4.4 Article

Tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile of a sunitinib powder formulation in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group study

期刊

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 69, 期 4, 页码 1021-1027

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-011-1798-2

关键词

Sunitinib; Pediatric; Pharmacokinetics; Formulation

资金

  1. Campini Foundation
  2. Pfizer
  3. NIH/NCRR/OD UCSF-CTSI [KL2 RR024130]
  4. NCI [U01 CA97452]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Sunitinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGF, PDGF, c-KIT, and flt-3 receptors. A pediatric phase I study of sunitinib capsules identified the maximum tolerated dose as 15 mg/m(2)/day. This study was conducted to evaluate sunitinib given as a powder formulation. Methods Sunitinib 15 mg/m(2) was administered orally daily for 4 weeks on/2 weeks off to patients <21 years old with refractory solid tumors. Sunitinib capsules were opened, and the powder sprinkled onto applesauce or yogurt. Plasma levels of sunitinib and an active metabolite, SU12662, were measured, and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. Results 12 patients, median age 13 (range 4-21) years, were treated. The most common first-cycle toxicities were leucopenia (n = 6), fatigue (n = 5), neutropenia (n = 4), and hypertension (n = 4). Three patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycle 1 (dizziness/back pain, hand-foot syndrome, and intratumoral hemorrhage/hypoxia). A median peak plasma sunitinib concentration of 21 (range 636) ng/ml was reached at a median of 4 (range 4-8) h after the first dose. The median exposure (AUC(0-48)) was 585 (range 196-1,059) h ng/l. The median half-life was 23 (range 13-36) h. The median trough concentration measured before day 14 dosing was 32 (range 12-58) ng/ml. Conclusions The pharmacokinetic profile of sunitinib appears similar between a powder formulation and published data using capsules. The powder formulation allows patients unable to swallow capsules to receive sunitinib.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据