4.4 Article

Penetratin-Mediated Delivery Enhances the Antitumor Activity of the Cationic Antimicrobial Peptide Magainin II

期刊

CANCER BIOTHERAPY AND RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 289-297

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2012.1328

关键词

cancer-targeted therapy; cationic antimicrobial peptide; cell-penetrating peptide

资金

  1. Natural Science Fund of China [81072566]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [201104645, 20100481392]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAPs) with antitumor activity have potential for use as novel antitumor agents because of their lower risk for induction of resistance. Of these peptides, magainin II (MG2) exhibited cytotoxicity in tumor cells only at high concentrations, likely due to the inefficiency of MG2 in cell membrane binding and cell entry. Conjugation to a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) might enhance the cytotoxicity of MG2 in tumor cells. Here, we constructed a fusion peptide MG2A by conjugating MG2 to the N-terminus of the CPP penetratin (Antp). It was found that the fusion peptide MG2A is more potent than unconjugated MG2 at tumor cell killing. The IC50s of MG2A for the tumor cells tested were at least 30 times lower than the IC50s of unconjugated MG2. These data indicate that conjugation to Antp significantly enhanced the cytotoxicity of MG2 in tumor cells. Moreover, the IC50s of MG2A for tumor cells are within 2 to 3 mu M, which are about three to five times lower than the IC50 for normal cells. Furthermore, chondroitin sulfate (CS) was found to be overexpressed on the surface of the tested tumor cells, and the cytotoxicity of MG2A could be inhibited by the addition of exogenous CS. These results suggest that binding of Antp to CS on tumor cells might be one important cause for the selective cytotoxicity of MG2A in tumor cells. Taken together, conjugation of MG2 to Antp can significantly enhance its antitumor activity, and the fusion of CAP to Antp might be an alternative for cancer-targeted therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据