4.5 Article

Targeting the unfolded protein response, XBP1, and the NLRP3 inflammasome in fibrosis and cancer

期刊

CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 452-462

出版社

LANDES BIOSCIENCE
DOI: 10.4161/cbt.27820

关键词

inflammasome; NLRP3; XBP1; ER; UPR; cancer; fibrosis; immune; oncogenesis; chemotherapy

类别

资金

  1. TherimuneX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  2. Center for Animal Referral and Emergency Services (CARES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing health care costs in the US are due in a large part to the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases in an aging population. Current therapeutic strategies for treating chronic diseases alleviate symptoms allowing patients to live longer with these diseases, but they do little, however, to alter the underlying disease course. Recent advances in molecular biology are revealing new drug targets that may significantly alter the course of these diseases and, as a result, offer economic relief from burgeoning health care costs. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress has been implicated as an underlying pathology in many chronic diseases, and, therefore, the development of therapies designed to ameliorate ER stress may yield novel, effective treatment strategies. Herein, we report that X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1) may be one of the earliest proteins engaged in response to ER stress. We show that a new signaling peptide derived from the ER-embedded transient receptor potential calcium channel protein 1 (TRPC1) engages XBP1 upstream of NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated maturation and secretion of IL-1/IL-18. Moreover, we show that a synthetic homolog of this signaling peptide (Naclynamide) administered intravenously twice weekly over a 4-week treatment course induced suppuration and evoked partial or complete resolution of lesions associated with a fibrotic granuloma, a lymphosarcoma, and a colo-rectal carcinoma in canine patients. The mode of action for Naclynamide as a first-in-class anti-cancer drug candidate is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据