4.5 Article

Depletion of CD4(+)CD25(high) regulatory T cells from tumor infiltrating lymphocytes predominantly induces Th1 type immune response in vivo which inhibits tumor growth in adoptive immunotherapy

期刊

CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 66-72

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/cbt.8.1.7131

关键词

adoptive cell transfer; regulatory T cell; 4T1; tumor infiltrating lymphocytes; Th1 type immune response; CD8(+)T cell; CD4(+)T cell

类别

资金

  1. LJ06011 [2007CB512401]
  2. China 863 [2006AA02Z403]
  3. China NSFC [30671952]
  4. Outstanding Medical Academic Leader [LJ06011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adoptive cell transfer (ACT) immunotherapy administered with prior host immunosuppression significantly improved the anti-tumor efficacy in a murine model. However, bulk transfer of lymphocytes containing suppressor lymphocyte subsets, including regulatory T cells to mice bearing late-stage tumors impaired this anti-tumor effect. In this study, we investigated the enhanced antitumor efficacy by adoptive transfer of Treg-depleted autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in advanced murine breast cancer. We found that, compared to bulk cell transfer, Treg-depleted cell transfer enhanced the activation and proliferation of both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. Most importantly, the immune response deviated towards the Th1 response reflected by increased IFN gamma and reduced IL-4 secretion in both CD4(+) and CD8+ T cells and an enhanced granzyme B release of CTL. Furthermore, the elicited Th1 response subsequently resulted in delayed tumor growth and prolonged mice survival as well as reduced lung metastasis in tumor-bearing nude mice. These results strongly indicated that Treg-depleted autologous cell transfer greatly enhanced Th1 type immune response, consequently leading to delayed tumor growth and reduced tumor burden. Therefore, ACT immunotherapy based on ex vivo selection of tumor-reactive lymphocytes resulted in enhanced anti-tumor immunity and provides important implications for further human studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据