4.7 Article

Evaluation of a patient navigation program to promote colorectal cancer screening in rural Georgia, USA

期刊

CANCER
卷 119, 期 16, 页码 3059-3066

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28033

关键词

cancer screening; colorectal cancer; colonoscopy; program evaluation; community health centers; community health workers; rural health

类别

资金

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [1U48DP0010909-01-1]
  2. National Cancer Institute (NCI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Early detection through recommended screening has been shown to have favorable treatment outcomes, yet screening rates among the medically underserved and uninsured are low, particularly for rural and minority populations. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a patient navigation program that addresses individual and systemic barriers to CRC screening for patients at rural, federally qualified community health centers. METHODS: This quasiexperimental evaluation compared low-income patients at average risk for CRC (n5809) from 4 intervention clinics and 9 comparison clinics. We abstracted medical chart data on patient demographics, CRC history and risk factors, and CRC screening referrals and examinations. Outcomes of interest were colonoscopy referral and examination during the study period and being compliant with recommended screening guidelines at the end of the study period. We conducted multilevel logistic analyses to evaluate the program's effectiveness. RESULTS: Patients at intervention clinics were significantly more likely than patients at comparison clinics to undergo colonoscopy screening (35% versus 7%, odds ratio = 7.9, P<.01) and be guideline-compliant on at least one CRC screening test (43% versus 11%, odds ratio = 5.9, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patient navigation, delivered through the Community Cancer Screening Program, can be an effective approach to ensure that lifesaving, preventive health screenings are provided to low-income adults in a rural setting. Cancer 2013; 119: 3059-66. (C) 2013 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据