4.7 Article

Costs and Outcomes Evaluation of Patient Navigation After Abnormal Cancer Screening Evidence From the Patient Navigation Research Program

期刊

CANCER
卷 120, 期 4, 页码 570-578

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28438

关键词

cancer; navigation; cost; outcomes; abnormal cancer screening

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute through its Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities [263-FQ-612391]
  2. National Institutes of Health [U01 CA116892, U01 CA117281, U01CA116903, U01CA116937, U01CA116924, U01CA116885, U01CA116875, U01CA116925]
  3. American Cancer Society [SIRSG-05-253-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDNavigators can facilitate timely access to cancer services, but to the authors' knowledge there are little data available regarding their economic impact. METHODSThe authors conducted a cost-consequence analysis of navigation versus usual care among 10,521 individuals with abnormal breast, cervical, colorectal, or prostate cancer screening results who enrolled in the Patient Navigation Research Program study from January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2010. Navigation costs included diagnostic evaluation, patient and staff time, materials, and overhead. Consequences or outcomes were time to diagnostic resolution and probability of resolution. Differences in costs and outcomes were evaluated using multilevel, mixed-effects regression modeling adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, language, marital status, insurance status, cancer, and site clustering. RESULTSThe majority of individuals were members of a minority (70.7%) and uninsured or publically insured (72.7%). Diagnostic resolution was higher for navigation versus usual care at 180 days (56.2% vs 53.8%; P=.008) and 270 days (70.0% vs 68.2%; P<.001). Although there were no differences in the average number of days to resolution between the 2 groups (110 days vs 109 days; P=.63), the probability of ever having diagnostic resolution was higher for the navigation group versus the usual-care group (84.5% vs 79.6%; P<.001). The added cost of navigation versus usual care was $275 per patient (95% confidence interval, $260-$290; P<.001). There was no significant difference in stage distribution among the 12.4% of patients in the navigation group vs 11% of the usual-care patients diagnosed with cancer. CONCLUSIONSNavigation adds costs and modestly increases the probability of diagnostic resolution among patients with abnormal screening test results. Navigation is only likely to be cost-effective if improved resolution translates into an earlier cancer stage at the time of diagnosis. Cancer 2014;120:570-578. (c) 2013 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据