4.7 Article

Kruppel-like factor 4 functions as a tumor suppressor in cervical carcinoma

期刊

CANCER
卷 118, 期 15, 页码 3691-3702

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26698

关键词

KLF4; cervical carcinoma; tumor suppressor; proliferation; p27Kip1

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30571951, 30725043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) protein, a zinc finger transcription factor that is highly expressed in epithelial tissues such as the gut and skin, has been implicated in both tumor suppression and progression. However, the role of KLF4 in human cervical carcinoma is still unclear. METHODS: The expression of KLF4 in cervical carcinoma tissues and cervical cancer cell lines was examined with immunohistochemistry and Western blot assay. The effects of KLF4 silencing and overexpression on the cell proliferation, cell viability, and tumor formation of cervical cancer cells were investigated. RESULT: KLF4 protein expression showed a pattern of gradual decrease from normal cervix to cervical carcinoma in situ and then to invasive cervical carcinomas (P < .05). Overexpression of KLF4 in SiHa and C33A cells resulted in significantly inhibited cell growth and significantly attenuated tumor formation. Consistently, KLF4 silencing in HeLa cells significantly promoted cell growth and tumor formation. Furthermore, KLF4 overexpression caused cell cycle arrest at the G1/S transition, along with the up-regulated expression of p27Kip1 protein. Promoter analysis revealed that KLF4 transactivated the expression of p27Kip1 through the specific motif that is between the nucleotides of -435 and -60 in its promoter. The results from chromatin immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated the physical interaction between KLF4 protein and this specific motif in p27Kip1 promoter. CONCLUSIONS: KLF4 may function as a tumor suppressor in cervical carcinoma by inhibiting cell growth and tumor formation. Cancer 2012. (C) 2011 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据