4.7 Article

The Association of Menstrual and Reproductive Factors With Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancers in the NIH-AARP Cohort

期刊

CANCER
卷 116, 期 6, 页码 1572-1581

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24880

关键词

head and neck neoplasms; stomach neoplasms; esophageal neoplasms; estrogen replacement therapy

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: In most populations, incidence rates of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract cancers (head and neck, esophagus, and stomach) are higher among men than among women. Established risk factors do not appear to explain these differences, suggesting a possible role for sex hormones. METHODS: 201,506 women of the NIH-AARP Diet and Health cohort completed a questionnaire in 1995-1996. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: During follow-up through 2003, 162 incident adenocarcinomas (ACs; esophagus, N = 25, and stomach, N = 137) and 353 incident squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs; head and neck, n = 297, and esophagus, N = 56) occurred. Among examined exposures, older age at menopause was associated inversely with SCC (P-trend across categories = .013) but not AC (P-trend = .501). Use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) was significantly associated with lower risk of SCC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77, 0.62-0.96) and nonsignificantly associated with lower risk of AC (HR = 0.81, 0.59-1.12). A subset (N = 127,386) of the cohort completed a more detailed MHT questionnaire a year after baseline. In 74,372 women with intact uteri, ever use of estrogen-progestin MHT conferred 0.47 (0.30-0.75) times the risk for SCC and 0.52 (0.26-1.07) times the risk for ACC. In 51,515 women with a hysterectomy before baseline, we found no associations between use of estrogen MHT and AC or SCC. CONCLUSIONS: Higher estrogen and progesterone levels may be related inversely to UGI cancers and in this way help explain lower incidence rates in women compared with men. Cancer 2010;116:1572-81. (C) 2070 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据