4.7 Article

Randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot study evaluating aprepitant single dose plus palonosetron and dexamethasone for the prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

期刊

CANCER
卷 112, 期 9, 页码 2080-2087

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23364

关键词

serotonin antagonists; antiemetic; vomiting; nausea; receptors; neurokinin-1; dexamethasone; aprepitant; palonosetron

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. The combination of palonosetron and aprepitant is safe and effective in the prevention of chemotherapy- induced emesis (CIE). The purpose of this pilot study was to ascertain the effectiveness of 1-day versus 3-day aprepitant in the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting in patients who were receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. METHODS. This study was institutional review board-approved and informed consent was obtained before this study was begun. This was a pilot, single-institution, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that evaluated 3 different treatment arms. All groups received palonosetron 0.25 mg intravenously on Day I and dexamethasone on Days 1-4. Arm A received aprepitant 125 mg orally on Day I followed by 80 mg on Days 2-3. Arm B received aprepitant 125 mg orally on Day I and placebo on Days 2-3. Arm C received placebos on Days 1-3. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the proportion of patients with acute and delaved emesis within each group. RESULTS. Seventy-five patients were included in the analysis. The study commenced with 3 groups; however, an interim analysis displayed unacceptable emesis events in Arm C, and this group was terminated. There were no significant differences between Arms A and B for emesis, nausea, or the use of breakthrough antiemetics. In Arms A and B, 93% of patients were emesis-free from Days 1-5 compared with only 50% in Arm C. CONCLUSIONS. From this pilot study of patients who were receiving palonosetron, aprepitant, and dexamethasone for highly emetogenic chemotherapy, a single dose of aprepitant displayed similar effectiveness compared with 3-day aprepitant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据