4.3 Article

Prospecting for ice association: characterization of freeze-thaw selected enrichment cultures from latitudinally distant soils

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 402-412

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.1139/W2012-010

关键词

antifreeze activity; freeze-thaw resistance; ice nucleation; ice recrystallization; soil bacteria

资金

  1. NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada)
  2. International Polar Year (CiCAT, Climate Change Impacts on Canadian Arctic Tundra)
  3. Queen's Research Chair
  4. OGS (Ontario Graduate Scholarship, Canada)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Freeze-thaw stress has previously been shown to alter soil community structure and function. We sought to further investigate this stress on enriched microbial consortia with the aim of identifying microbes with ice-associating adaptations that facilitate survival. Enrichments were established to obtain culturable psychrotolerant microbes from soil samples from the latitudinal extremes of the Canadian Shield plateau. The resulting consortia were subjected to consecutive freeze-thaw cycles, and survivors were putatively identified by their 16S rRNA gene sequences. Even though the northerly site was exposed to longer, colder winters and large spring-time temperature fluctuations, the selective regime similarly affected both enriched consortia. Quantitative PCR and metagenomic sequencing were used to determine the frequency of a subset of the resistant microbes in the original enrichments. The metagenomes showed 22 initial genera, only 6 survived and these were not dominant prior to selection. When survivors were assayed for ice recrystallization inhibition and ice nucleation activities, over 60% had at least one of these properties. These phenotypes were not more prevalent in the northern enrichment, indicating that regarding these adaptations, the enrichment strategy yielded seemingly functionally similar consortia from each site.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据