4.3 Article

Low-fidelity simulation improves mastery of the aseptic technique for labour epidurals: an observational study

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-014-0173-2

关键词

Epidural Catheter; Aseptic Technique; Sterile Technique; Conventional Teaching; Neuraxial Anesthesia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeThe objective of this study was to determine the impact of a low-fidelity simulation model on mastering the sterile technique during placement of epidural catheters.MethodsTrainees, including residents and fellows, were given conventional teaching consisting of a lecture and a video demonstration on the appropriate sterile technique to apply during the placement of epidural catheters. The trainees were then provided with a one-on-one demonstration session using a low-fidelity Styrofoam (TM) epidural model, followed by a series of simulation sessions. After conventional teaching and following each simulation session, the trainees were assessed on their performance until competence was achieved based on a 15-point checklist. The retention of competence was subsequently evaluated bi-weekly in clinical practice for four assessments.ResultsTwenty-one trainees participated in the study. The average score for the residents following conventional teaching was 6.0 out of 15 points on the checklist. Following the initial one-on-one hands-on demonstration, the average score increased to 10.8 (difference = 4.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.3 to 6.2; P < 0.001). The average score for the fellows following conventional teaching was 7.9 out of 15 points on the checklist. Following the initial one-on-one hands-on demonstration the average score increased to 11.2 (difference = 3.3, 95% CI: 0.05 to 6.6; P = 0.047). During the retention of competence phase, scores ranged from 13-15 for both residents and fellows.ConclusionThis study describes a comprehensive teaching model for mastering the sterile technique during epidural catheter placement. It suggests that low-fidelity simulation improves the learning process when used in addition to conventional teaching.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据