4.5 Article

Thermodynamic description of the Al-Li-Zn system

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.calphad.2010.11.006

关键词

Al-Li-Zn system; Aluminum alloys; Thermodynamic properties; Order-disorder transition; CALPHAD technique

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [50771016, 50971027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Al-Li-Zn system was critically assessed using the CALPHAD technique. The solution phases (liquid, bcc, fcc and hcp) were described by the substitutional solution model. The compounds Al(2)Li(3) and Al(4)Li(9) in the Al-Li system had homogeneity ranges of Zn and were treated as (Al, Zn)(2)Li(3) and (Al, Zn)(4)Li(9) in the Al-Li-Zn system, respectively. The compounds alpha Li(2)Zn(3), beta Li(2)Zn(3), alpha Li(2)Zn(5), beta Li(2)Zn(9) and alpha LiZn(4) in the Li-Zn system had no solubility of the third component Al in the Al-Li-Zn system. A two-sublattice model (Al, Li, Zn)(0.2) (Al, Li, Zn)(0.8) was applied to describe the compound beta LiZn(4) in the Al-Li-Zn system in order to cope with the order-disorder transition between hexagonal close-packed solution (hcp-A3) and beta LiZn(4) with the Mg-type structure. The ternary compound tau(2) with a NaTI-type structure (B32) had the same structure with the compounds AlLi in the binary Al-Li system and LiZn in the binary Li-Zn system. In the present work, the three compounds AlLi, LiZn and tau(2) were treated as one phase by a two-sublattice model (Al, Li, Zn)(0.5)(Al, Li, Zn)(0.5) in order to cope with the order-disorder transition between B32(AlLi, LiZn and tau(2)) and body-centered cubic solid solution (bcc-A2). The ternary intermetallic compounds tau(1) and tau(3) in the Al-Li-Zn system were treated as the formula Li(Al, Zn)(2) and (AlLi, Zn)Zn(3), respectively. A set of self-consistent thermodynamic parameters describing the Gibbs energy of each individual phase as a function of composition and temperature in the Al-Li-Zn system was obtained. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据