4.6 Article

Development and validation of high performance liquid chromatographic and derivative spectrophotometric methods for determination of gadodiamide in liposomal formulations

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 7, 期 19, 页码 8315-8325

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ay01709b

关键词

-

资金

  1. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)
  2. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  3. FAPEMIG (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gadodiamide is a complex of gadolinium (Gd), whose structure presents two carboxylate groups of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) substituted by two amide groups (BMA). The use of liposomes as carriers of gadodiamide (Gd-DTPA-BMA) has shown great potential for cancer therapy. In this study, two methods using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) without derivatization and derivative spectrophotometry (DSUV) were developed and validated for determination of Gd-DTPA-BMA in liposomes. No interference was observed by using the HPLC method. Also, the third-order derivative has eliminated the interference from the lipid formulations. The methods have shown to be selective, precise, accurate, and linear in the range of 0.1-0.5 mu mol mL(-1) for HPLC and 25-285 mmol mL(-1) for DSUV. The limits of quantification were 3.50 x 10(-2) mu mol mL(-1) for HPLC and 18.33 mmol mL(-1) for DSUV, while the limits of detection were 2.02 x 10(-)2 mu mol mL(-1) and 12.42 mmol mL(-1) for HPLC and DSUV, respectively. Both methods were employed to determine the concentrations of Gd-DTPA-BMA entrapment in three liposomal formulations with different characteristics. No significant difference was found between the results obtained by the developed methods. HPLC and DSUV methods presented advantages over existing methodologies, such as simplicity, speed, low cost, and applicability to the characterization of liposomes containing Gd-DTPA-BMA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据