4.4 Article

Focal-Depth Estimation Using Pn-Coda Phases Including pP, sP, and PmP

期刊

出版社

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0120120015

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We address a classic problem in observational seismology, namely the precise estimation of the focal depth of small to moderate earthquakes. The data available are three-component records including Pn onsets and their coda. We believe that the Pn coda contains P-type phases that originate in the source area and lag behind due to longer travel paths. Phases such as pP and sP are generally not included in seismic bulletins, and even cepstrum and array f-k techniques have not been successful in extracting such arrivals. We use recent developments in polarization analysis (Roberts and Christoffersson, 1990; Fedorenko et al., 2008) to extract secondary P phases in local and regional records from five earthquakes. Phase characteristics are typically slowness and lag time relative to the preceding Pn phase. However, information is incomplete for confidently deciding whether an arriving wavelet should be classed as pP, sP, or something else. This validation problem is resolved by picking several coda arrivals that can uniquely be fitted to travel-time curves for suites of Pn-coda waves. Focal-depth estimates, even for Ground Truth 05 events, are seldom more accurate than to 5 km, and therefore we compared our results with those from moment tensor analysis. Differences in depth estimates were less than 5 km and for H < 12 km the first secondary Pn arrival is generally sPn. The Dt (Pn - pPn) lag time for shallow events is 2.0 s or less and hence difficult to detect in the coda. Most techniques for focal-depth estimation are not user friendly. In contrast, the polarization schemes tested are easy to use and depth estimates are more accurate than those derived from ground truth studies based exclusively on P-wave arrivals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据