4.7 Article

Adaptive model of thermal comfort for offices in hot and humid climates of India

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 39-53

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.01.002

关键词

India; Comfort standards; Office buildings; Thermal comfort; Comfort temperature; Adaptive model

资金

  1. Japan Society for Promotion of Science
  2. University of Tokyo, Japan
  3. Fulbright Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current Indian indoor comfort standards do not reflect the country's great cultural and climatic diversity. There have been very few reports on the actual environments in Indian offices in the last three decades. We conducted a thermal comfort field study in 28 naturally ventilated (NV) and air-conditioned (AC) offices in Chennai and Hyderabad for fourteen months, and collected 6048 responses from 2787 individuals. Warm humid and composite climates are experienced in these cities, and these two climates cover about 80% area of the country. This paper proposes an adaptive thermal comfort model for South India based on this data. Mean comfort temperature was found to be 28.0 degrees C in NV mode, and 26.4 degrees C in AC mode on all data. Chennai had slightly higher comfort temperature. We found an adaptive relationship between the prevailing outdoor temperature and the comfortable indoor temperatures. Most of the environments in NV mode and about half in AC mode were warmer than the current Indian Standard upper limit (26 degrees C). In most cases, the air speed was below 0.20 m/s. Most of the subjects used fans. Air speeds of 1 m/s increased the comfort temperature by 2.7 K in both the modes. Logistic regression predicted 87% and 50% fan usage at 29 degrees C in NV and AC modes respectively. Several factors prevented further thermal adaptation. We can potentially improve comfort and reduce air-conditioning by providing higher air speeds with energy-efficient fans. Such strategies may be vital given the scale of the scarcity of power. (c) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据