4.7 Article

Indoor/outdoor relationship of fine particles less than 2.5 μm (PM2.5) in residential homes locations in central Indian region

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 44, 期 10, 页码 2037-2045

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.02.010

关键词

Particulate matter; Indoor-outdoor relationship; Indoor air; Indoor air pollution

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi [SR/S4/AS-262/05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high levels in developing countries and the apparent scale of its impact on the global burden of disease underline the importance of particulate as an environmental health risk and the consequence need for monitoring them particularly in indoor microenvironment. PM2.5 mu m, 1.0 mu m, 0.5 mu m and 0.25 mu m were measured inside and outside 14 residential homes located in different microenvironment during a six-month period (October 2007-March 2008) in Agra located in the central region of India. Particulate mass concentrations were measured using Grimm aerosol spectrometer for 24 h inside and outside the homes located in roadside, rural and urban area, along with the field survey study done in the same region. The indoor average concentrations recorded for PM2.5, PM1.0, PM0.5 and PM0.25 were maximum for the rural homes (173.03 mu gm(-3), 133.26 mu gm(-3), 96.02 mu gm(-3), 8.56 mu gm(-3)) followed by roadside homes (137.93 mu gm(-3), 117.09 mu gm(-3), 68.17 mu gm(-3), 8.55 mu gm(-3)) and then by urban homes (135.55 mu gm(-3), 102.92 mu gm(-3), 38.38 mu gm(-3), 6.35 mu gm(-3)). The average I/O ratios for PM2.5, PM1.0, PM0.5 and PM0.25 in roadside and rural areas were close to or above 1.00 and less than 1.00 for urban areas. The I/O ratios obtained were linked to the indoor activities using occupant's diary entries. The positive values of correlation coefficient (r) also indicated the indoor concentrations of particulate matter were correlated with the corresponding outdoor concentrations. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据