4.4 Article

Memory difficulties are not always a sign of incipient dementia: a review of the possible causes of loss of memory efficiency

期刊

BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN
卷 112, 期 1, 页码 71-81

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldu029

关键词

dementia; functional memory disorder; mild cognitive impairment; subjective cognitive decline

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-0211-24079]
  2. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-0211-24079] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  3. National Institute for Health Research [PB-PG-0211-24079] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Memory problems are a very common reason for presenting to primary care. There is a need for better treatments for dementia. Increased government and media interest may result in greater number seeking help for memory problems, which may not reduce the dementia gap but rather increase numbers seen who do not have dementia. This review highlights the issues around the diagnostic criteria and terminology used for people with memory complaints. A comprehensive literature search using PubMed using keywords for articles on subjective memory decline (SMD)/impairment/complaints, subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and functional memory disorder (FMD). There is a need for early accurate detection of dementia syndromes so that trials of new treatments can begin earlier on the disease process. Diagnostic criteria and terminology used for disorders of memory including SCD, MCI and FMD. This article reviews SCD and whether this can be used to predict Alzheimer's disease. The review also discusses the terminology used for non-progressive memory problems and the long-term outcomes for this patient group. The accurate distinction of premorbid dementia syndromes from benign non-progressive memory problems. Studies of treatment options for people with benign non-progressive memory problems and longer-term follow-up to determine which patients develop chronic problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据