4.4 Article

Does exercise increase the risk of upper respiratory tract infections?

期刊

BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN
卷 90, 期 1, 页码 111-131

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldp010

关键词

athletes; exercise; immunosuppression; respiratory tract infections; sports

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heavy exercise induces marked immunodepression, which is multifactorial in origin. Evidence showing clinical significance of this immunodepression is scarce. We assessed in a systematic manner whether physical activity or intensity of exercise increase susceptibility to upper respiratory tract infections (URTI). A literature search was performed using the keywords 'upper respiratory tract infections', 'athletes', 'exercise' and 'physical activity'. We considered all studies reporting of the effect of exercise, physical activity, sport and training on susceptibility to URTI. A total of 162 publications were identified and 30 studies were eligible (4 descriptive, 18 observational and 8 interventional). The 30 studies included 8595 athletes (5471 runners, 2803 swimmers) and 1798 non-athletes. Moderate activity may enhance immune function, whereas prolonged, high-intensity exercise temporarily impairs the immune competence. Athletes, when compared with lesser active individuals, experience higher rate of URTI after training and competitions. In non-athletes, increasing physical activity is associated with a decreased risk of URTI. The relationship between exercise and URTI is affected by poorly known individual determinants such as genetic factors, fitness, nutritional status or atopy. Elite athletes may have a decreased susceptibility to URTI. The dose-response relationship between immunodepression and risk for URTI during the weeks following heavy exercise. What are the clinically relevant methods to assess exercise-induced immunodepression? Is down-regulation of immunity after intense exercise a protective response to limit inflammation? Is there a role for nutritional or pharmaceutical interventions to reduce risk of URTI?.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据