4.6 Review

Physical activity and risk of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 49, 期 4, 页码 224-U33

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092778

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Studies evaluating the relationship of physical activity and stomach cancer risk have yielded inconsistent and largely inconclusive results. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that assessed the relationship between physical activity and risk of gastric cancer. Methods Following a standard protocol, we searched medical literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Google Scholar) from inception to July 2012, and conducted a random effects meta-analysis. Results Seven prospective cohorts and four casecontrol studies of physical activity and gastric cancer risk, with 1 535 006 people and 7944 cases of gastric cancer were included. We found a modest protective association between sufficient physical activity and gastric cancer risk (relative risk: 0.81 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.96); I-2=68.5%) in the prospective studies and (relative risk: 0.78 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.91); I-2=0%) in case-control studies. The association appeared weaker in smokers than in non-smokers (p heterogeneity=0.035). The association may also be weaker for gastric cardia cancer relative to the distal non-cardia subtypes. Physical activity type (recreational or occupational), intake of alcohol, total energy intake, consumption of fruits and vegetables and infection with Helicobacter pylori had no influence on the association. The effect measure from cohort studies (relative risk: 0.82 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.97); I-2=61.7%) and case-control studies (relative risk: 0.83 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.04); I-2=49.8%) did not differ materially at higher physical activity levels. Conclusions We conclude that a regular physical activity may be protective against stomach cancer risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据