4.6 Article

Clozapine v. chlorpromazine in treatment-naive, first-episode schizophrenia: 9-year outcomes of a randomised clinical trial

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 199, 期 4, 页码 281-288

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.081471

关键词

-

资金

  1. Janssen and Lilly through APIRE
  2. Pfizer
  3. Acadia
  4. Allon
  5. AstraZeneca
  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  7. Forest Labs
  8. GlaxoSmithKline
  9. Janssen
  10. Merck
  11. Organon
  12. Wyeth
  13. Novartis Pharmaceutical Company,

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The differential effects of so-called 'first- and second-generation' antipsychotic medications, when given in the first episode, on the long-term outcome of schizophrenia remain to be elucidated. Aims We compared the 9-year outcomes of individuals initially randomised to clozapine or chlorpromazine. Method One-hundred and sixty individuals with treatment-naive, first-episode schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder in a mental health centre in Beijing, China were randomised to clozapine or chlorpromazine treatment for up to 2 years, followed by up to an additional 7 years of naturalistic treatment. The primary outcome was remission status for individuals in each group. Results Individuals in both groups spent essentially equal amounts of time in each clinical state over the follow-up time period (remission, 78%; intermediate, 8%; relapse, 14%). There were no significant differences on other measures of illness severity. The clozapine group was more likely than the chlorpromazine group to remain on the medication to which they were originally assigned (26% V. 10%, P=0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups on other secondary efficacy outcomes. Conclusions These findings support the comparability in effectiveness between antipsychotic medications but with;lightly greater tolerability of clozapine in the treatment of first-episode psychosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据