4.4 Article

Infant neurocognitive development is independent of the use of iodised salt or iodine supplements given during pregnancy

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 110, 期 5, 页码 831-839

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114512005880

关键词

Iodine; Pregnancy; Thyroid function; Neuropsychomotor development

资金

  1. Consejeria de Salud of the Junta de Andalucia [PI-0469/2009/Consejeria de Salud]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The benefits of iodine supplements during pregnancy remain controversial in areas with a mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of improving iodine intakes, with iodised salt (IS) or iodine supplements, in pregnant Spanish women. A total of 131 pregnant women in their first trimester were randomly assigned to three groups: (1) IS in cooking and at the table, (2) 200 mu g potassium iodide (KI)/d or (3) 300 mu g KI/d. No differences were found in thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4), free triiodothyronine (FT3) or thyroid volume (TV) between the three groups. Regardless of the group in which women were included, those who had been taking IS for at least 1 year before becoming pregnant had a significantly lower TV in the third trimester (P=0.01) and a significantly higher urinary iodine in the first (173.7 (SD 81.8) v. 113.8 (SD 79.6) mu g/l, P=0.001) and third trimesters (206.3 (SD 91.2) v. 160.4 (SD 87.7) mu g/l, P=0.03). Also, no differences were seen in TSH, FT4 or FT3. Children's neurological development was not significantly associated with the consumption of IS for at least 1 year before becoming pregnant and no differences were found according to the treatment group. In conclusion, in pregnant women with insufficient iodine intake, the intake of IS before becoming pregnant was associated with a better maternal thyroid function. The form of iodide intake was not associated with maternal thyroid function or children's neurological development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据