4.4 Article

The effect of dietary administration of 2-oxoglutaric acid on the cartilage and bone of growing rats

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 110, 期 4, 页码 651-658

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114512005570

关键词

2-Oxoglutaric acid; Bone; Growth plate; Articular cartilage; Growing rats

向作者/读者索取更多资源

2-Oxoglutaric acid (2-Ox), a precursor to hydroxyproline - the most abundant amino acid in bone collagen, exerts protective effects on bone development during different stages of organism development; however, little is known about the action of 2-Ox on cartilage. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the influence of dietary 2-Ox supplementation on the growth plate, articular cartilage and bone of growing rats. A total of twelve male Sprague-Dawley rats were used in the study. Half of the rats received 2-oxoglutarate at a dose of 0.75 g/kg body weight per d in their drinking-water. Body and organ weights were measured. Histomorphometric analyses of the cartilage and bone tissue of the femora and tibiae were conducted, as well as bone densitometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Rats receiving 2-Ox had an increased body mass (P<0.001) and absolute liver weight (P=0.031). Femoral length (P=0.045) and bone mineral density (P=0.014), overall thickness of growth plate (femur P=0.036 and tibia P=0.026) and the thickness of femoral articular cartilage (P<0.001) were also increased. 2-Ox administration had no effect on the mechanical properties or on any of the measured pQCT parameters for both bones analysed. There were also no significant differences in histomorphometric parameters of tibial articular cartilage and autofluorescence of femoral and tibial growth plate cartilage. Dietary supplementation with 2-Ox to growing rats exerts its effects mainly on cartilage tissue, having only a slight influence on bone. The effect of 2-Ox administration was selective, depending on the particular bone and type of cartilage analysed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据